These Testing Methods Should Be Mandatory for Any Software

tags will bookend the entire article text.

In today‘s fast-paced digital world, software is at the heart of how most businesses operate and how people live their daily lives. Software quality, reliability, and a seamless user experience are no longer negotiable – they‘re essential for success. That‘s why investing time and resources into thorough software testing is one of the most important investments any organization can make.

While testing requires effort, the cost of neglecting it is far higher. Consider these statistics:

• The Systems Sciences Institute at IBM found that the cost to fix a defect found during implementation was 6.5 times more than one identified during design.
• The cost to fix a defect during testing is 15 times more than one identified during design, and 100 times more if it‘s not found until production. ^1

Defect Found During	Relative Cost to Fix
Design	1x
Implementation	6.5x
Testing	15x
Production	100x

Source: IBM Systems Sciences Institute

• A study by the Department of Commerce‘s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that inadequate software testing costs the U.S. economy an estimated $59.5 billion annually, or 0.6% of GDP. ^2

Clearly, catching and fixing defects early in the development process saves significant time and money down the road. And more than ever, in today‘s competitive market, businesses can‘t afford to release buggy software that frustrates customers and damages their reputation.

The 5 Essential Testing Methods

So what specific testing methods are needed for effective quality assurance? As a full-stack developer who has worked on all layers of the application stack, I‘ve seen firsthand how neglecting certain types of testing allows defects to slip through that should have been caught much earlier.

Here are the 5 testing practices I believe should be mandatory for any software development effort:

1. Unit Testing

Unit testing focuses on validating the smallest testable parts of an application, typically individual functions or classes. The goal is to verify each unit behaves as intended in isolation before combining units into more complex features.

Unit tests are usually written by developers as they implement code, following a test-driven development (TDD) approach where tests are created before the code itself. As requirements change, having a robust set of unit tests allows developers to confidently refactor and enhance the codebase, knowing they can quickly detect if something breaks.

Some best practices for effective unit testing include:

• Design tests to cover both positive/happy paths and negative/error paths
• Mock out any external dependencies to keep tests fast and deterministic
• Aim for high code coverage (ideally 80%+)
• Keep tests small and focused on one behavior
• Follow the AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
• Make tests independent and idempotent

Popular unit testing frameworks include:

• Java: JUnit, Mockito, AssertJ
• JavaScript: Jest, Mocha, Chai, Sinon
• .NET: NUnit, xUnit, Moq
• Python: unittest, pytest
• Go: testing package in standard library
• Ruby: RSpec, Minitest

To measure coverage, tools like Cobertura, Istanbul, SimpleCov, and Gcov can be used.

In my experience, units tests are the foundation of a solid testing strategy, especially for backend and infrastructure code. Codebases with thorough unit tests are much easier to maintain and extend over time. Neglecting unit testing, on the other hand, leads to fragile code that breaks in unexpected ways with every change.

2. Integration Testing

While unit testing looks at pieces in isolation, integration testing is about ensuring the pieces work properly together. Integration tests verify the interfaces between units and detect any issues in how they communicate and exchange data.

Integration testing is especially critical for distributed systems with many microservices or serverless functions that must work in concert. A failure in how two services interact can bring down the entire system.

Integration tests usually come after unit tests in the development process, once individual units are stable enough to start combining. Common integration testing strategies include:

• Big Bang: Combine all units together at once and test the entire system. This can make it difficult to pinpoint the source of failures.
• Incremental: Gradually combine units and test the growing system at each stage. This catches issues earlier but requires more upfront planning. Subsets include:
  • Bottom Up: Test lower level units first, then test higher level units that rely on them. This catches foundational issues early.
  • Top Down: Start with high level units and replace low level units they depend on with stubs/mocks until the low level is built and tested.
  • Sandwich: Combine top down and bottom up, testing high and low level units first, then testing the integration points in the middle.

Tools for integration testing include:

• Java: Citrus Framework, REST Assured
• JavaScript: Jasmine, Chakram
• Python: Tavern
• .NET: SpecFlow
• Ruby: Capybara

Continuous integration servers like Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, and GitLab can automatically trigger integration tests with each code change and provide quick feedback if something breaks.

Without integration testing, defects can lurk in the interactions between units. These don‘t manifest until the system is more fully assembled, at which point they are more time consuming and costly to debug and fix.

A robust suite of integration tests has been the safety net for every major refactoring I‘ve done. The bigger the change, the more grateful I am to have a thorough set of integration tests to ensure I haven‘t inadvertently broken a crucial workflow.

3. System Testing

Once all units are developed and integrated, system testing looks at the system as a whole to verify it meets requirements. The focus is on testing complete end-to-end flows as a user would experience them.

System tests are usually conducted by a dedicated QA team on a staging environment that mimics production. Techniques commonly used include:

• Functional testing to validate the system does what it should per requirements
• Usability testing to assess how intuitive and easy to use the system is
• Performance testing to gauge responsiveness and resource usage under various loads
• Security testing to probe for vulnerabilities and ensure sensitive data is protected
• Compatibility testing to verify the system works across different platforms, devices, and configurations

Automation tools for system testing include:

• Web: Selenium, Cypress, Playwright
• Mobile: Appium, Espresso, XCUITest
• Desktop: AutoIt, Winium
• API: Postman, SoapUI

Exploratory testing, where testers go off script and use their knowledge of the system to hunt for defects, is also highly valuable at this stage. No predefined test plan can cover every possible user flow or edge case.

Neglecting system testing before release risks shipping a product that may work as coded but fails to satisfy real user needs and business objectives. I‘ve seen projects with 100% unit test coverage deploy to staging only to immediately crash when real user flows are executed. System testing is the last line of internal defense.

4. Acceptance Testing

Also known as User Acceptance Testing (UAT), this is the final checkpoint where key business stakeholders verify the delivered system meets their acceptance criteria. The emphasis is on ensuring the product achieves the original business goals.

The sooner acceptance criteria are defined, the better. Ideally this is done during the initial requirements gathering phase. Waiting until the end to get stakeholder buy-in can result in costly rework if expectations weren‘t clearly communicated.

Acceptance testing may take various forms depending on the type of system and business domain:

• Alpha testing: In-house business users test the system in a lab environment
• Beta testing: A limited set of external end users test the system in their own environments
• Contract acceptance testing: Ensuring all contractually agreed requirements are met
• Regulation acceptance testing: Validating compliance with legal and regulatory standards
• Operational acceptance testing: Confirming the system is ready to be deployed and maintained in production

Tools used for acceptance testing depend on the nature of the system and use case:

• Session replay: FullStory, Hotjar, and LogRocket can capture user interactions for analysis
• Unmoderated user testing: UserTesting.com and UserZoom allow users to record themselves using the system
• Crowdsourced testing: Applause (formerly uTest) and Rainforest QA source testers from around the world
• Test case management: qTest, Zephyr, and TestRail help organize and track test cases and results

Failing to conduct thorough acceptance testing can result in a product that meets specifications but fails to satisfy customers. The business risks shipping features that don‘t actually move the needle.

I‘ve found the most successful acceptance tests involve close collaboration between QA, business stakeholders, and actual end users. The more realistic the testing scenario, the higher confidence you can have in the results.

5. Regression Testing

Regression testing involves re-running previously passed tests to confirm that new changes haven‘t broken existing functionality. With iterative development methodologies like Agile, regression testing should be performed after each sprint or release cycle.

Automation is essential for efficient regression testing, as manually re-running a large test suite is impractical. Whenever a new test is created and passes, automate it and add it to the regression suite. Then with each new build, trigger the automated regression tests to get rapid feedback if anything has regressed.

Common tools for automated regression testing overlap with those used for system and integration testing:

• Selenium for web UIs
• Appium for mobile apps
• Postman and SoapUI for APIs
• Cucumber for BDD-style acceptance tests

Prioritize automating tests for the most critical paths and common workflows. Then gradually expand coverage to lower priority areas. Use techniques like data-driven testing and page object modeling to make tests more maintainable.

Neglecting regression testing allows defects to quietly creep in and accumulate over time. Eventually, users complain that a feature that once worked now seems buggy. I‘ve hunted down my share of frustrating "it used to work" defects that could have been prevented by solid automated regression testing.

The Shift-Left Mindset

Traditionally, testing was an isolated activity tacked on at the end of development, right before release. Defects found this late require costly rework and cause release delays. That‘s why modern development practices embrace shifting quality assurance upstream or "left" in the development lifecycle.

With shift-left testing, verification and validation activities are integrated throughout the development process from the very beginning rather than waiting until the end. The goal is to identify and fix issues as early and quickly as possible, when the cost of change is lowest.

Some key practices that embody a shift-left testing approach include:

• Test-Driven Development (TDD): Writing unit tests before writing the actual code, ensuring requirements are clearly understood and functionality is verified from the start
• Behavior-Driven Development (BDD): Defining acceptance criteria in a domain-specific language that can be directly transformed into automated tests
• Continuous Integration (CI): Building and testing the system automatically with every code change to catch regressions early
• Continuous Delivery (CD): Deploying each successful build to a production-like environment and running more comprehensive tests to ensure release readiness
• Chaos Engineering: Intentionally injecting failures to test system resiliency and identify weaknesses before they cause real outages

Shifting left requires a quality-focused mindset across the entire development lifecycle and organization. It‘s not just the job of testers – everyone is responsible for quality. For developers like me, it means treating testing as an integral part of coding rather than someone else‘s problem. The result is fewer defects, faster releases, and happier customers.

Fitting the Pieces Together

With so many different types of testing, it can be daunting to know where to start. But each method plays a specific role that builds on the others. Here‘s how I think about fitting the pieces together:

• Unit tests are the first line of defense, verifying system building blocks in isolation
• Integration tests ensure the building blocks play nicely together
• System and acceptance tests verify the assembled system achieves business objectives and satisfies users
• Regression tests prevent defects from creeping in as the system evolves

The right balance of methods depends on the nature of the system, risk profile, and development methodology. A web application for an e-commerce site and an embedded system for a medical device will have very different testing needs. Likewise, a mission-critical financial system requires more thorough testing than an internal prototype.

But in general, a multi-layered approach that shifts testing left and incorporates multiple complementary methods is the surest path to delivering high quality, reliable software.

The Payoff

Committing to these testing methods requires an upfront investment, but the benefits far outweigh the costs:

• Reduced defects that frustrate customers, damage your reputation, and drain support resources
• Faster time to market by catching issues early before they cause release delays
• Decreased maintenance costs by making the system more maintainable and extendable
• Improved customer satisfaction by delivering a better quality product that meets user needs
• Lower business risk by increasing confidence in the system‘s reliability and security
• Increased developer productivity by enabling more efficient development and debugging

So don‘t think of testing as an optional cost center. When done right, it‘s a value multiplier that enables your organization to move faster with higher quality.

In summary, these are the testing methods I believe should be mandatory for any serious software development effort:

1. Unit testing to verify the building blocks
2. Integration testing to validate the building blocks work together
3. System testing to ensure the whole is greater than the sum of its parts
4. Acceptance testing to confirm business and user needs are met
5. Regression testing to protect against defects as the system evolves

Together, these form a strong quality assurance foundation to deliver better software faster. Don‘t skimp on them – your users and your bottom line will thank you.